Lesson 5 of 25 · 6 min
Intraday valuation against end-of-day valuation
A day that closes fine can still have failed, and which fact counts depends on when the test ran.
A day has one closing price and thousands of intraday prices. The test gives different answers depending on which of them it reads, and agreements differ on whether the lender may read the intraday ones.
Follow a single holding of 6,400 shares through one session. It opens at $118.40, so the collateral is worth $757,760. It falls through the morning to $104.75 at 11:20, valuing the collateral at $670,400. It recovers into the close and finishes at $112.30, worth $718,720. The balance is $512,000 throughout and the threshold is 74 percent.
At the open the permitted balance is $757,760 × 0.74 = $560,742.40 and the test passes. At 11:20 it is $670,400 × 0.74 = $496,096, and the balance exceeds that by $15,904; the ratio is $512,000 ÷ $670,400 = 76.4 percent. At the close the permitted balance is $718,720 × 0.74 = $531,852.80 and the test passes again, at a ratio of 71.2 percent.
So the day contained a breach of $15,904 that the end-of-day process cannot see. An overnight engine reading closing prices records nothing at all. A real-time monitor reading the 11:20 print records a failing account, and where the agreement permits action on intraday values, the right to sell existed at 11:20 and expired without being exercised. The same session produced both facts, and which one governs is a drafting question rather than a market question.
Intraday monitoring does not make a lender faster at the same test. It makes the lender's test read a lower number, because the lowest price of a day is always below its close.
Key terms
- Intraday valuation
- Testing the account against live prices during the session, so the lowest print of the day can trigger a breach.
- End-of-day valuation
- Testing against official closing prices only. A breach that opens and closes within one session leaves no trace.
- Real-time monitoring
- A continuously running version of the same comparison, usually reserved for volatile or concentrated collateral.
Worked example
One session, two verdicts
6,400 shares pledged, balance $512,000, threshold 74 percent.
- 09:30 open at $118.40
- Passes
- 11:20 low at $104.75
- Fails by $15,904
- Ratio at 11:20
- 76.4%
- 16:00 close at $112.30
- Passes
- What the overnight report shows
- Nothing
$757,760 × 0.74 = $560,742.40.
$512,000 − ($670,400 × 0.74).
$512,000 ÷ $670,400.
$718,720 × 0.74 = $531,852.80.
The account was in breach for part of one afternoon and in compliance at both ends of it. Only one of those facts reaches a closing-price report.
Check yourself
The same 6,400 shares, balance $512,000, threshold 74 percent. Why does the 11:20 breach of $15,904 matter if the day closed in compliance at 71.2 percent?
Saved in this browser only. No account, nothing sent anywhere.
Educational only. Nothing in this lesson is investment, legal or tax advice, or a recommendation to enter into any transaction. Figures are illustrative and computed from the inputs stated in the lesson.